Monday, August 03, 2009

Cash for Everything

More Cash for Clunkers?
(click here for the complete article on WSJ)

Obama administration should extend this benefit for everything, like cash for junk food - buy junk food and go to the nearest wholefood for free exchange with organic food + cash that you paid for junk food. 

How about cash for marrying again ?, divorce your wife, for a brand new young wife and govt will pay half the divorce costs and marriage costs.


Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Superstition and finance: A total eclipse of the brain | The Economist

Superstition and finance: A total eclipse of the brain | The Economist(click here)

MODERN stockmarkets, with their lightning trades and endless reams of data, sometimes seem to be run by automatons, not people. But lift the curtain and the wizards pushing the buttons turn out to be as susceptible to fear and irrationality as any of their abacus-wielding ancestors. That, at least, is the conclusion of Gabriele Lepori of the Copenhagen Business School, whose work on solar and lunar eclipses suggests that modern-day man, even of the steely-eyed, stockbroking variety, is still prey to ancient superstition.

Monday, July 20, 2009

Great Moment in Entrepreneurship - Last 30 years

Great Moment in Entrepreneurship - Last 30 years(click the link here)


Friday, July 17, 2009

Superb Ad ... just love it

Superb Ad ... just love it


Thursday, July 16, 2009

China's recovery: A fine balancing act | The Economist

China's recovery: A fine balancing act | The Economist

"The 19th century belonged to the British, the 20th century to the Americans and the 21st to the Chinese, Invest accordingly." Warren Buffett



Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Remittance Flows to Developing Countries to Decline By 7.3% in 2009, Predicts World Bank


Remittance Flows to Developing Countries to Decline By 7.3% in 2009, Predicts World Bank(click the link)


I was reading another article which says that American universities are going to get hit big time as more and more good schools open up in India and China and also protectionism of American Govt makes students from developing nation think twice to spend $150k on a MBA and to go back home without a job.

Monday, July 13, 2009

100 Most Creative People

There are no rules about creativity. Which made constructing our list of the 100 Most Creative People in Business a tricky task. We looked for dazzling new thinkers, rising stars, and boldface names who couldn't be ignored. We avoided people we've profiled in the recent past. We emphasized those whose creativity addresses a larger issue -- from the future of our energy infrastructure to the evolution of philanthropy to next-generation media. So read on. Enjoy. Quibble. Complain.

Wednesday, July 08, 2009

mba-channel.com - IIPM: For a handful of dollars

IIPM: For a handful of dollars

The Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM) boasts being India’s best business school and has been saying it cooperates with several renowned schools in Europe and the US for years – which is often false information. But although its unserious business practices are known, some renowned business schools nonetheless cooperate with the controversial Indian school.

{title}

"IIPM – Best only in Claims" was the recent article headline from the Indian career magazine Careers360 that illuminated the strange business practices of the IIPM in detail, including the false information about partner schools. (Source: Careers360)

In contrast, the largest Indian newspapers have been holding back on critiquing the business school for years. With its entire-page ads, the IIPM is ultimately one of their largest advertising customers. Some renowned publications even get carried away with puff pieces sometimes, which the IIPM proudly displays on its website. It isn’t always recognizable whether the presented articles aren’t really just editorially-constructed advertisement texts.

The IIPM has also been praised by Della Bradshaw, editor for MBA topics and the MBA ranking at the Financial Times (FT). In her "The Maverick Management Guru" article (published in 2006), Bradshaw notably wrote uncritically about the founder “Honorary Dean” Arindam Chaudhuri and his, according to him, largest business school in the world.    

It would’ve already been logical to scrutinize the supposed success story. Indian IIPM grads receive their MBA degree, for example, from the International Management Institute (IMI) in Brussels, which is unknown and not accredited in Belgium. (Source: www.timi.edu
   
The IIPM still uses its coup cleverly today. “IIPM in Financial Times, UK. Feature of the Week. Must read" flashes on the website. The link to the three year-old FT articles follow.
   
The trick with the partner schools is also old. The Stanford Graduate School of Business significantly distanced itself back in 2007 from the IIPM’s statements that Stanford would offer a certified executive education program with the IIPM. “This claim is false,” wrote Gale Bitter, Associate Dean and Director. “Neither the Stanford Graduate School of Business nor the office of Stanford Executive Education has ties of any kind with the IIPM.” Read statement

Before, in december 2006 the Deputy Director at the Stanford Center for Professional Development, Paul Marca, had already written a letter to the Director of Global Strategy at IIPM, Siddharth Nambiar, in which he has complaint about the misleading advertising und has asked him immediately to cease "any and all uses of Stanford`s name and logo". After Gale Bitter`s statement Siddharth Nambiar complaint to her about the defamation of the good name of the IIPM and referred to some Stanford professors who had taught at IIPM.

And Stanford is hardly an isolated case. The Chicago Booth School of Business recently emerged as a partner as IIPM students were to take part in the Advanced Global Management Program in Chicago. So IIPM announced: "The World´s No.1 Ranked B-School. What makes the program perhaps most unique and distinct from any other similar program in India is the compulsory International Residency Program on Advanced Global Management that the students will undergo at the Graduate School of Business, University Chicago."

Following demand, Chicago reacted immediately and wrote the IIPM on June 23rd: "We kindly ask that all mention of Chicago GSB being a part of this Advanced Global Management program be immediately removed from all pages of IIPM’s sites." "We are really sorry for this," answered Chanda Mehra, Senior Manager of the Global Outreach Program at the IIPM. 

The document was changed and now "The World´s No.1 Ranked B-School" practically hangs in an empty space. The following sentence is all that remains: "What makes the program perhaps most unique and distinct from any other similar program in India is the compulsory International Residency Program on Advanced Global Management that the students will undergo." Where the participants will take the program however remains a mystery.

{title}But not every business school is anxious about its reputation. The behavior of the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley is noteworthy. In February the Californian school told the Indian magazine Careers360 that Berkeley doesn’t have anything to do with the IIPM and has already heard that the school is known for announcing false connections with top schools.

But then the press department corrected the answer and explained that there is a new customer relationship between the IIPM and the Center for Executive Education. The first program took place in June. And in May Berkeley answered that the IIPM, as a customer, could call itself a "business school ‘participating’ with the Haas School of Business."  

Clearly business schools are looking for cooperation with Indian schools so frantically that they yield their good name, Careers360 commented on the behavior. They put aside their ethical principles and forfeit their professionalism in order to earn a few more dollars.
   
The document even creates the impression that Berkeley gives credits for the program. Responding to a query by MBA Channel, Berkeley explained on July 2nd: "The Haas School has asked IIPM to take the Haas/UC Berkeley logo off its web site and marketing materials and to correct its language regarding the certificate of completion and the credits. The Center for Executive Education does not offer credits, only a certificate of completion with respect to the segment of the program that it has taught."

{title}The Judge Business School at the University of Cambridge is also mentioned as a “partner B-School.” Clearly it has no qualms about having its logo next to the questionable school. The school offers IIPM participants a five-day executive education program in Cambridge, writes the press office. "IIPM have engaged us to deliver and the first group will commence in July 2009. There are no university qualifications awarded from Cambridge University or Judge Business School. The only certificate is a certificate of attendance which is what we provide to participants on all our programmes."

www.iipm.edu

Monday, July 06, 2009

Limiting migration: People protectionism | The Economist

Limiting migration: People protectionism | The Economist


People protectionism

Jul 1st 2009
From Economist.com

Rich countries respond to the economic downturn by trying to limit the flow of migrants


AFP
IN THE boom years, migrants picked fruit in southern California's orange groves, worked on construction sites in Spain and Ireland, designed software in Silicon Valley and toiled in factories all over the rich world. Many will continue to do so, despite the economic downturn. But as unemployment rises in most rich countries, attitudes towards migrants are hardening.
Attacks on Romanians in Northern Ireland and on Indian students in Australia are the most visible and disturbing manifestations of growing xenophobia. In response, many governments are also tightening their migration policies, according to a report published by the OECD on Tuesday June 30th. Governments are reducing quotas for foreign workers and imposing tougher entry requirements on them in an effort to control the flow. Some are even paying existing migrants to go home.
Several countries have cut the numbers of people allowed to enter through official programmes. Spain let in 15,731 foreign recruits under its “contingente” scheme in 2008, but slashed the quota to a tiny 901 this year. The Italian government has announced that no non-seasonal workers will be admitted in 2009, whereas 70,000 were officially admitted in 2008. South Korea welcomed 72,000 migrants under its Employment Permit Scheme last year, but this year's limit is set at 17,000. And Australia, which had earlier said that 133,500 skilled migrants could enter the country this year, has now lowered the limit to 108,100.
Many rich countries maintain lists of occupations for which there is a shortage of domestic workers, giving foreigners with the appropriate skills preferential treatment. Several countries have reduced the scope of such lists drastically. In Spain, for example, the list issued in October 2008 had nearly a third less professions listed than the previous version.
Some countries have made it harder for employers to hire foreigners by making them jump through more hoops than before. In Britain, for example, employers hoping to hire certain kinds of skilled foreigners face tougher rules about where job advertisements must be placed. In America, the “Employ American Workers Act” attached to the fiscal stimulus bill, puts stricter conditions than before on any company that receives government bail-out money and wants to hire skilled foreigners under the country's H-1B visa programme. As a result, some American banks and other financial-services firms have rescinded job offers to foreign-born graduates of American universities and postgraduate programmes. Some of those who have the paperwork allowing them to work are finding it harder than ever to renew their permits.
Some countries are getting creative in their attempts to reduce not just fresh flows of migrants, but also the stock of migrants already present, by encouraging people to go home. Some migrants to Spain from outside the EU, for example, became eligible in November last year for a portion of their Spanish benefits if they returned home and promised not to return for three years. The Czech government is promising to provide the air-fare and €500 ($704) to workers who have been laid off. About 1,100, mostly contract labourers from Mongolia, had accepted by the end of March.
Given that many more locals find themselves without jobs in the downturn, it may seem sensible to limit immigration. It is hardly surprising that Spain, where unemployment is 18%, is looking particularly hard for ways to stop migrant flows. But the OECD's analysis points to several problems with this. Lessons from the 1970s, when the recession that followed the oil-price spikes led Germany, France, and Belgium to clamp down on immigration, suggest that such anti-migrant rules can persist even when they have outlived their use.
In general, given the politics, it is much easier to tighten controls, as countries are doing now, than to loosen them when the economy starts growing again. There are also genuine shortages of workers in some professions, such as medicine and certain technical jobs such as engineering, which locals cannot easily and quickly retrain for. Clamping down on the total flow of migrants, therefore, risks making such shortages worse.
In addition, some measures to limit official migration, such as making it harder for temporary work-permit holders to renew their permission to stay, risk pushing people into staying on illegally. Paying someone to go back home for three years, for example, would be counterproductive if the economy rebounds by the end of 2010 and such workers are in demand once again. When the world economy emerges from the doldrums, some countries that have passed legislation restricting the ability of local companies to hire foreigners may find themselves lacking the flexibility that migrants bring. Migrant workers, for example, accounted for over two-fifths of employment growth between 2003 and 2007 in Austria, Denmark, Italy and Spain, and 71% in the same period in Britain.

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

INC.com - The Best Industries for Starting a Business Right Now

INC.com -The Best Industries for Starting a Business Right Now